Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VENARC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 14:35, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

VENARC

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant   (talk)  17:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete: no indications of notability. I hope Smerdis of Tlön won't get offended for me using his WP:B2B essay again, but the phrases like "The company has played key roles in working alongside MySQL in order to create an easy to use, easy to manage, enterprise server solution" (translation: "the company set up several MySQL servers") are indeed alarming. Basically I'm not sure whether this company does routine web application development or just web site design. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 02:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. The current text seems to me to qualify for speedy deletion as entirely unambiguous advertising and patent nonsense: The company uses a combination of software development and marketing tools to translate its clients expectations into a product with a competitive edge.  And link to WP:B2B all you want; it's what it's for, and I wouldn't have bothered writing it if we didn't have a large problem on our hands with this stuff. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:08, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.