Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VEO


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 11:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

VEO

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Poorly referenced, original research article about what I assume is a non-notable marketing phrase. Unable to find any reliable sources on Google News, Google Books and HighBeam. I redirected the article to Video advertising but the article creator has repeated reverted without any explanation. - MrX 03:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 15:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: sales patter, spam, and borderline patent nonsense: ...the process of maximizing viewer engagement within an interactive video (the digital asset). The objective of VEO is to maximize the insight and monetization of video assets while minimizing waste by making any perceivable object or sound inside the video interactive and engage-able. By making the entire video asset interactive and any object or sound within the video a data-point, content owners experience a much higher probability that viewers will specify and engage exactly what interests them. The result is greatly increased rates of conversion, virality and data-capture with correspondingly lower bounce rates and page abandonment. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:28, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a corporate buzzword neologism. Or at least I think so, the article is written in incomprehensible marketing semi-nonsense to the point that it almost reads like parody, and may as well be for a type of cheese sandwich for all the clarity of the text. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.