Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VGASAVE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. W.marsh 00:52, 16 February 2006 (UTC)

VGASAVE
Not particularly encyclopaedic, too technical (the average user may not realise at first sight what the article is about). Spaceman85 18:59, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand. Considering what it does, I'd say that's fairly noteworthy, though admittedly, the article would have to be written in a manner for the layman to understand it.--み使い Mitsukai 19:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, improve, and expand. . PJM 19:17, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A horrid stub, but that's not grounds for deletion. The subject matter is obscure, but perfectly encyclopedic. --Ashenai 00:02, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, but it needs work. Warrens 22:46, 11 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.