Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VGBabes.com


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  05:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

VGBabes.com

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Doesn't follow WP:WEB --esanchez, Camp Lazlo fan! 04:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Most of article is not verifiable and no assertion of notibility is made. Best thing to published mentions is passing comments in blogs.--Dacium 04:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Under A7, so tagged.--RWR8189 04:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete typical forum crud, complete with a list of mods and a big section on "forum wars", not to mention, as always, not a single reliable source. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  16:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable, not verified, and seems like just a promotion for the site. - Iotha 22:23, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing WP:V. Alexa rank in the 309 thousandsths, nor its reach of 4 per million, doesn't say much out about notability. We don't need to know the fine details of what goes on between consenting adults on the site either. Ohconfucius 01:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.