Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VG Cats


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was to speedily keep, bad faith nomination. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 01:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

VG Cats
Is not suitable for Wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Igotsomeapples (talk • contribs)


 * Keep - 673,000 Google hits for "VG Cats", popularity in the video gaming community, Scott Ramsoomair's been featured in a column on CBS.com ... lots of notability here. Tony Fox 21:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - Long running comic that has been regularily updated for the last 4 1/2 years, definitely worthy of an article. -- VederJuda 21:39, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Nominator does not provide reason why this is unsuitable for Wikipedia. While the article itself didn't assure me of its notability, the info provided by Tony Fox and VederJuda convinces me otherwise. Agent 86 21:50, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong keep, immensely popular webcomic. --badlydrawnjeff talk 22:10, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep: Nom has not asserted any valid reason for deletion. As stated by others, VG Cats is an immensely popular webcomic. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 22:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * This has been listed on WikiProject Webcomics/Deletion. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l ✎☠ 22:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Very popular webcomic. Nom has given no good reason for deletion. jgp 22:23, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Nomination of VG Cats is 15th edit. Dread Lord C y b e r S k u l l  ✎☠ 22:24, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep: Well known webcomic. Deathawk 22:48, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep User AFDed in bad faith/insufficient reasons to delete. User is newish to wikipedia.-- Andeh 23:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Well known, established webcomic with large fan base. Substaintual article. --Monotonehell 23:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep I've never read it and yet I've heard of it. I suggest bad faith nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:08, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Article is on the front page of Google when searching for vg cats. DJSnuggles 01:13, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep Bad faith nom, user is uncivil and has vandalized, claiming "Fixing typo" while actually inserting in links to youtube and newgrounds. Hobbeslover talk/contribs 01:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.