Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VH1's 100 greatest songs of the '90s


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. BJ Talk 05:30, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

VH1's 100 greatest songs of the '90s
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Subjective list, criteria for inclusion dependent only on what the programme-makers thought would fill an hour or so of telly and attract advertising, possible copyright violation. This will never be more than it is now, and its presence in Wikipedia serves only as an advert for the show from which it is taken. pablo hablo. 08:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC) Delete What Tavix said. KMFDM FAN (talk!) 22:10, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge - agree with the above comments. It is poorly sourced and serves as an advert. Possibly merge into VH1's 100 greatest songs. Andrewmc123 (talk) 10:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep NOtable show that will continue to be replayed in coming years. I think the ranking may be a copyvio though. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - agree with nom. Simply a duplicate of the list itself; lack of secondary notable info. - SoSaysChappy (talk) 22:56, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. This list only serves a trivial purpose. Blackjays1 (talk) 23:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely trivial article that serves no purpose but to advertise the show. Tavix | Talk  19:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.