Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIMBY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

VIMBY

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are generally brief mentions. red dogsix (talk) 06:50, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion (PROD previously declined).
 * Delete ,,,, A whole lot of corporate spam for another company, per nom. Hey you, yeah you! (talk) 18:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –&#8239;Joe (talk) 09:08, 6 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.