Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VIP Team To Do List


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. (ESkog)(Talk) 07:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

VIP Team To Do List
Another piece of project management software fomr the list where redlinks are expunged. 224 unique ghits, no evidence presented of innovation, market share, significance, multiple non-trivial coverage, per WP:SOFTWARE Just zis Guy you know? 12:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable, advertising.Bjones 12:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per above. Wickethewok 15:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam. --CharlotteWebb 18:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Wait a minute!, I feel like being in a court among jury crying: guilty, guilty, guilty. You know, I agree there is no "evidence presented of innovation, market share, significance", but how many of programs listed provide this information? I haven't noticed any. Just start telling such things and there will be more chances to be accused in advertising and spamming. There were some text I took from the site that sound advertising, like 'Intuitive interface'. Ok. Got rid of them. Have other claims, do tell. Don't want to discuss it? Great. Delete it. You were quick enough to consider it non-significant and non-notable. Not equal to MS Project? Probably. Ok. Delete it from the list of PM software, but why delete the article itself?. -- Serge Toper 10:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.