Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VISIS Software


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

VISIS Software

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Prod was removed so taking it to AFD. This is an unsourced company overview; I have tried to dig up some reasonable sources but without much luck - appears to fail WP:CORP. Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 14:31, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * delete, can always be recreated with appropriate sources. Note, if we decide to delete, such a recreation should be considered a valid WP:RPDA. Another comment, VISIS SOFTWARE has already been speedily-deleted in the past (17 June 2008). --dab (𒁳) 15:06, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Visis was speedied earlier today too (and prev. on the 20th of May). --Errant Tmorton166(Talk) 15:11, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Should have been speedily deleted as unambiguous advertising: VISIS SOFTWARE has a very clear and focused punch line "Product.Service.Satisfaction", that shows its Nature of Business Competences and dedication towards the customer satisfaction.  And after reading this article, I still haven't the faintest idea what the people working at this business actually spend their time doing, other than it has something vaguely to do with computers. Which means that this business fails to show historical, technical, or cultural significance or long term historical notability. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.