Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VI Airlink


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:53, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

VI Airlink

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Tiny airline, with a "fleet" of only two small planes. Perhaps it will become notable in the future, but at this point there is only 1 independent source in a very minor publication. Does not meet WP:CORP or WP:GNG. Crusio (talk) 00:47, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:24, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:31, 13 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. It's notable in that it is an airline based on the British Virgin Islands (the airline literature claims the only one that is solely based on the BVI) and provides emergency services for the islanders. It's not invisible on Google.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 22:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Would you think that a bus-company with 2 cars would be notable, even if it were the only one on the BVI? Not being invisible on Google certainly does not equate notability either. Where are the independent reliable sources? --Crusio (talk) 09:54, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.