Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VNIIS Exemption Letter (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Gave it a relist, but realised that taking the first AfD into account, this has effectively been listed for over a month with three delete votes and no keeps. No point letting this hang around for another week. Jenks24 (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

VNIIS Exemption Letter
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Incomprehensible, and probably not notable. No comments at the first afd probably because nobody could understand it  DGG ( talk ) 02:15, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete The article may or may not be notable, but it is so completely incomprehensible that it would be simpler to rewrite it from scratch than improve it. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:21, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 11:35, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.