Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VQ WeCoupon


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

VQ WeCoupon

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable mobile app concept. Probably made-up by kids—but not so clearly so as to be speedied under A11. The only thing I can find about it on the internet is juvenile drawings at http://vq-wecoupon.com/. —teb728 t c 06:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Unreferenced, this should've been speedied. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:43, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 *  Speedy Delete - A7  - Tagged as such as this obviously fails A7, This didn't need a AFD either. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:28, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
 * "this obviously fails A7" The irony is that you're right; that means it doesn't meet it. Adam9007 (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yeah dude you tagged it under A11 which was still incorrect so get off your high horse, I hadn't realized A7 didn't apply to apps etc. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:03, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I did say (in my edit summary) this is not under any A7 category did I not? Adam9007 (talk) 01:05, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes.... that doesn't mean you're correct tho, I've had plenty of people remove my criterion and add one that is incorrect altogether and the article's been deleted per my criterion, Anyway we all make mistakes and I admit my CSD handywork was a mistake. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:13, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * delete speedy delete is not appropriate as A7 does not apply, and the text is not very promotional. However there is no claim of importance and no references. News shows nothing, and a web search only finds social media. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:41, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I knew this wasn't an A7 due to its scope. Adam9007 (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG at least. Adam9007 (talk) 00:48, 17 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.