Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VY Orionis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:48, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

VY Orionis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Doesn't meet WP:NASTRO. Waaaay below naked eye brightness. No entries in popular catalogues such as HR. The current sources are a Simbad link, a 1918 articles about a different star, and some surveys that happen to mention this star among many. I couldn't find anything more compelling, scientific or popular. Previous PROD removed by creator. Lithopsian (talk) 22:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete: concur with nom. No significant coverage found. Praemonitus (talk) 17:24, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.