Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V Kennelly


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:08, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

V Kennelly

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails GNG. Not even his first name is known. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. BeanieFan11 (talk) 17:05, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep There are alot of nominations for deletions for articles on rugby league footballers where there first name isn't known, I think they should all be nominated in the same AfD. ビッグツリ64 (talk) 21:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC) Block evasion  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby league-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:55, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete As far as I can see totally fails GNG. BTW, subject's first name is Vernon.  Subject does get a few very routine mentions in match reports, but nothing anywhere near in-depth.  Aoziwe (talk) 07:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - searches conducted above by Aoziwe show that it is doubtful that Kennelly passes GNG Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. His lack of notability is such that the article creator was unable to determine his first name (Aoziwe may have figured that part out), the position he played, date/year of birth, date/year of death, or anything else other than that he reportedly played one game during the 1914 season for the "Eastern Suburbs" team. Fails GNG for lack of SIGCOV in multiple, reliable, independent sources. Cbl62 (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, subject was a winger.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.