Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaclav Zizler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

Vaclav Zizler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

does not meet notability criteria in WP:GNG and also does not meet WP:ACADEMIC --MATThematical (talk) 18:25, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2015 May 21.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:36, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. Google scholar (for author:v-zizler) shows citation counts of 923, 229, 160, 144, 131, etc. For a low-citation subject (pure mathematics), this is a lot, enough I think to pass WP:PROF. He also has multiple books with multiple in-depth published reviews, possibly enough for WP:AUTHOR, and the article (which has been significantly improved since nomination) now also includes a national award of unclear significance. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 15:44, 29 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - I find David Eppstein's evidence above to be compelling. Carrite (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.