Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vad livet har att ge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Roosarna. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Vad livet har att ge

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I found no significant coverage per WP:NALBUM. SL93 (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Roosarna, who were known as Kikki Danielsson & Roosarna at the time the album was released. I was able to find brief notices about this album in Swedish sources but they appear to be mostly promotional and directory-like. Speakers of that language may be able to find something better. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 16:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I would be fine with a redirect the album is found be non-notable. I didn't realize that Roosarna was once known as that. SL93 (talk) 20:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It's confusing because Kikki Danielsson released several solo albums on her own, but she was a member of Roosarna on every single one of their albums. Even more confusingly, the Roosarna albums were released as Roosarna featuring Kikki Danielsson, then as Kikki & Roosarna, and then as Kikki Danielsson & Roosarna. Anyway, the album being discussed here is a Roosarna album with Kikki on it. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 03:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ASTIG️🎉  (HAPPY 2022) 02:50, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Very strong keep: I have found another source, with links still alive. J 1982 (talk) 20:10, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That is a reprint of the source that is in the article. It even has the same title and date. SL93 (talk) 20:12, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, but Aftonbladet is still a stronger source. J 1982 (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That would still be one source. A reprint is not an entirely new source. We need multiple reliable sources. SL93 (talk) 20:26, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to Roosarna. Fails WP:NALBUM per nom. A WP:BEFORE shows nothing beyond the source presented by J. SBKSPP (talk) 00:58, 5 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.