Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadakkanadu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Verifiability concerns have been adequately addressed. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 00:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Vadakkanadu

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article about an alleged village has no visible verifiable references from reliable sources. Contested prod. — Jeff G. (talk&#124;contribs) 13:30, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Keep per the hilarious additions and comments by SpacemanSpiff.--TParis00ap (talk) 14:17, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm sure that if you lived somewhere where the possession of a change of clothes was a matter for comment you wouldn't find the subject hilarious. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:37, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The hilariousness of the comment was based on the fact that it was the only source to prove the existance of the village. However, keep in mind that many people have different senses of humor and I may infact find such a thing funny considering my own poverty as a kid.  Although I am heartbroken about any suffering child (or animal), I still find the sole source funny.  This is because I compartmentalize my feelings and I am not going to bow to political correctness.  When I run for President of the United States, please feel free to bring this up (I am considering the 2032 or 2036 races).--TParis00ap (talk) 22:41, 9 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- - Spaceman  Spiff  16:02, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. According to this the aquaduct mentioned in the article is situated "in Mathoor, hamlet of Aruvikkarai revenue village in Thiruvattar Panchayat Union" - no mention of Vadakkanadu or any similar spelling. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a verifiable village, I don't know how many people live there, but I know how many people don't have a set of change clothes (sadly), per the refs I've added. - Spaceman  Spiff  21:31, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as a verifiable village, per SpacemanSpiff's excellent work. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per SpacemanSpiff (good job). It's a verified village.--Oakshade (talk) 18:47, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.