Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vadhyar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   G3 by PeterSymonds. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Vadhyar

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Pure hoax. Vaids and Upadhyas are not connected even remotely to Ezhavathy. Kshatriya.Knight (talk) 17:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * See this - Articles for deletion/Vadhyayar Kshatriya.Knight (talk) 17:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because [all of them contains the same hoax about Ezhavathy being Brahmin, and were created by the same user]: :   :    :    :
 * Speedy them all as patent nonsense. Raymie Humbert (t • c) 23:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete on grounds of being dictionary definitiion. Carrite (talk) 15:28, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:33, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete All: Wiki is not a place for Hoax and POV. 17:35, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Shannon1488 (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.