Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagif Ibrahimov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Vagif Ibrahimov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Content fork of the unsourced Vagif Ibrahimov Rza oglu, created after the nomination. Looks like selfpromo. Effectively unsourced, as the given sources are links to works, not the required independent sources. Google, with its severe limitations towards other scripts than Western, only gives 5 hits, all Wikipedia related. So within the limitations, the subject fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 22:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment - You should just boldly redirect this to the other article. No need to discuss. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Given that the original article was tagged for BLPPROD (by me) and that there appears to be one reference (however useless it might be) there now, it doesn't qualify under that process; therefore, it might be worth keeping this AfD open to determine the fate of both of these articles. I'm not !voting yet, but I felt it best to give my suggestion on what process might work best here. -- Kinu  t/c 22:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Instead the other article has been redirected to this one, so it's all a moot point now. We may as well have an actual discussion. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet WP:PROF, no national/international awards and h-index of 6.  Jinkinson   talk to me  18:57, 31 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete There's a lack of significant independent coverage and none of his publications seem to have very many citations. 131.118.229.17 (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.