Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vagina tightening and toning


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus to delete. --Angr (t·c) 17:34, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

Vagina tightening and toning
Provides no usefull information, and is strongly biased, and seems like an ad for the link in the article. It's simply not encyclopedic.--Vidarlo 13:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) This entry appears to be an add for the website linked.
 * Info: A google search for "vagina tightening" +surgery -wikipedia -porn brings up over 400 hits. Zunaid 13:55, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * This could actually become a very useful article (although as it stands I'm tempted to say redirect to Kegel exercise). BD2412  T 14:05, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If redirecting, I'm more for incorporating it into the Vagina article. I agree it could become a usefull article, but as it stands, it is not encyclopedic, and it looks like an ad. It's also strongly biased. -- Vidarlo 14:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup or rewrite. Subject matter has potential, current subheadings make a good article plan, but POV & bias must be removed. &mdash;gorgan_almighty 15:00, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Like I've said numerous times, just get rid of the damn link (which I have done). Illuminus


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.