Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaginal Jesus (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Vaginal Jesus
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not assert notability, no reliable sources, fails WP:BAND. Boogerpatrol (talk) 11:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note result of prior Afd was delete, though this was several years ago. Propose a salt if consensus/ closing admin determines this is appropriate. Boogerpatrol (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Userfy. FokkerTISM 11:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability, article was alredy in user space and so re-userfying a clearly non-notable topic serves no purpose. GiantSnowman 13:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:12, 6 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. Does not satisfy WP:GNG or WP:MUS.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  11:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above.&mdash; Σosthenes 12  Talk  17:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)Sosthenes12
 * Just because they're racist doesn't mean they're non-notable. FokkerTISM 06:01, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment Indeed... as per WP:CENSOR... which is why we apply WP:MUS and WP:GNG to articles like this, rather than delete them just because we find them distasteful.  Catfish  Jim  and the soapdish  09:11, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Seth Putnam himself filled in as a session member according to Wicked Sick Records (now since offline and blocked by archive.org's robot texts). He even covered their songs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdRn8s83fAo Groar! (talk) 04:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not going to argue the case of WP:NMUSIC for this, nothing appears to be verifiable in the slightest, and some unsourced content involving Joseph Paul Franklin is also a serious WP:BLP violation.  Ritchie333  (talk)  (cont)   15:59, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Non notable group. Koala15 (talk) 15:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.