Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaginal fungus


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was BJAODN, no need to have this suffering here for 5 days... Tito xd (?!? - help us) 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)

Vaginal fungus
Tagged as patent nonsense, but sadly although this is utter nonsense it isn't patent nonsense and hence isn't speedyable. Delete all the same. CLW 19:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Well, I suppose you have to laugh really, or you'd cry. Shame I just had dinner really. Excuse me. Dan 19:29, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete yeah just delete. --Pboyd04 19:34, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I tagged it as patent nonsense, but I stand corrected. Utter nonsense it is. David Sneek 20:24, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Made me laugh though, reads like an old fashioned "Booke of Claymes of Medisyn". doktorb | words 20:30, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense, "cover gentitals with bird droppings" - it's as nonsensical as possible while still being in English. Obvious hoax. Ifnord 20:53, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, in case it can't be speedied (I believe it could). Phædriel  21:01, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Also, LOL. - Liontamer 22:56, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Right mako 22:58, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NeoJustin 23:11, January 2, 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete "or smothering the growth with bird droppings, the fresher the better." This is total nonsense. Ajwebb 23:31, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-02 23:44Z 
 * Delete. Clear hoax&mdash;I would have no objection to this being speedied as per Articles for deletion/Potato queen (which was also created by the same editor). JeremyA 23:49, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete c-lingus is never going to be the same again...... Jcuk 01:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Really some of us, I mean we the wikipedians, are great! In my opinion, a fit case that this “creation” (smiles) should be stored in a proper vault: BJAODN. --Bhadani 08:38, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.