Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaibhav Chhaya


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:57, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Vaibhav Chhaya

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not qualifying WP:ANYBIO or WP:ARTIST if we consider him an artist? There are mentions in a few news articles but all of them are his quotes or opinions on some social issues. Nothing by others or something which says he is notable  QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 07:36, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:16, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 08:17, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak keep I think the following three sources:
 * show that the subject has some prominence as a contemporary Dalit poet-activist, and may just about push him over the WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR line. There may be other sources/reviews in Marathi but the nominator is likely better equipped than I to find and evaluate the them. Abecedare (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * show that the subject has some prominence as a contemporary Dalit poet-activist, and may just about push him over the WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR line. There may be other sources/reviews in Marathi but the nominator is likely better equipped than I to find and evaluate the them. Abecedare (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * show that the subject has some prominence as a contemporary Dalit poet-activist, and may just about push him over the WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR line. There may be other sources/reviews in Marathi but the nominator is likely better equipped than I to find and evaluate the them. Abecedare (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * show that the subject has some prominence as a contemporary Dalit poet-activist, and may just about push him over the WP:GNG/WP:NAUTHOR line. There may be other sources/reviews in Marathi but the nominator is likely better equipped than I to find and evaluate the them. Abecedare (talk) 09:23, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

 QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 15:13, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nomination and this is the further analysis of sources mentioned.
 * Can you take a look at the Mumbai Mirror article again, since it is is more than "Just a mention of Vaibhav's name and a quote by him"? Almost all of the article starting from "Vaibhav Chaya, like his guru Namdeo Dhasal, has little value for prosody" concerns the subject. Abecedare (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * , right I checked again, Yes it takes a review of works by Vaibhav, Nisar Zalte, Kabeer Shakya and few more people. that article has enough of the coverage, which makes two sources have enough sources. I guess this subject is yet to gain enough coverage, they might get more in coming years but atleast now we don't have enough of it.   QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 16:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking a second look. Abecedare (talk) 16:28, 5 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:AUTHOR, WP:SIGCOV. Possible case of WP:TOOSOON.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:42, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not meet any of the 4 criteria of WP:POET - minor poet with only one book - the writing section says that he has only written articles for newspapers or magazines, no major critical essays on poetry, no anthologies, no poetry awards - promotional article for non-notable person; therefore, delete - Epinoia (talk) 20:28, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.