Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaibhav Choudhary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Vaibhav Choudhary

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A student union councillor who does not appear to meet WP:NBIO. The article was recently deleted under CSD A7 as a self-written vanity page and was immediately recreated by another user. Three of the five cited references merely mention the subject's name as one of the elected student union councillors. The fourth reference from livehindustan.com is a short blurb by the paper congratulating "our correspondent Vaibhav Choudhary" on his appointment as Sports President of Delhi University, and is neither independent nor in-depth coverage. I am however unable to access the fifth reference from amarujala.com. My attempts to find further coverage on the subject only came up with more short blurbs mentioning Vaibhav Choudhary's name as one of the elected student union councillors, and nothing more. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:26, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bennv3771 (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:48, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable enough, just a Run of the mill union leader -- SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 14:31, 2 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG Tayi Arajakate (talk) 13:23, 2 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete I speedy deleted this yesterday as an A7 Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:20, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * @ Hi. Just out of curiosity (nothing to do with this discussion), when an admin deleted a page in mainspace, does it get included in their watchlist automatically? —usernamekiran (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
 * delete I really want to say "per Jimfbleak", but I cant for obvious reason. Even though Delhi University Students' Union is a notable organisation, it is not a government body, office, or organisation. Getting elected as head of that organisation doesnt make the subject notable per notability guidelines for politicians. Talking about general notability guidelines, the subject doesnt pass them either - as mentioned in the nomination, and in other comments, the subject lacks significant coverage. Talking about Amar Ujala, I dont know about the print media, but the online version is like a tabloid. They cover, and spice up almost every topic. I havent read the source in discussion, but Amar Ujala online edition should not be considered for establishing a subject's notability. Other sources have been explained in the nomination. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.