Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vaibhav Choudhary (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. The title will be salted. BD2412 T 04:31, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Vaibhav Choudhary
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable vanity spammer, sourced entirely to non-rs (Deccan, Asian Age and Hindustan Times all have publication sections that are PR and are not vetted or identified by their stuff, thus unreliable.) Praxidicae (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete not seeing adequate sourcing for GNG.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep follow criteria & Actor IMDb profile.Onecasm (talk) 17:40, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete — no in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources independent of subject. Celestina007 (talk) 17:59, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt was deleted 2 months ago as non notable, still not notable. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:15, 19 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete "influencer" is not a job. KingSkyLord (talk &#124; contribs) 18:22, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt "Influencer" is not a notable job, not enough reliable sources as well. I don't see this subject ever being notable, also previously deleted for the same reasons. -- Puddleglum 2.0 (How's my driving?) 18:30, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. No RS support these claims. --Kbabej (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. The sources are an IMDB profile he wrote himself, and three press releases, each with a disclaimer from the newspaper that published it. No evidence of notability. Maproom (talk) 18:45, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and prevent recreation. Non-notable spammer and less than reliable sources. “Influencers” being considered notable for article purposes in the absence of anything else also sets a bad precedent.  Woerich   (talk)   22:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not even close to being a notable person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete all refs are press release. David notMD (talk) 23:19, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and at this point WP:SNOWSulfurboy (talk) 02:47, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete As per norm.Jai49 (talk) 08:27, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. Does not meet WP:GNG. -- Kinu t/c 09:03, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:G4 as a recreation of a page that was deleted previously per WP:AFD and does not address the reasons for deletion. I have tagged the page with the speedy deletion template. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 17:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I looked at the page history and a G4 deletion has been declined so I am taking back my previous comment. -KAP03 (Talk &#x2022;&#x20;Contributions &#x2022;&#x20;Email) 17:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt the last thing Wikipedia needs is more vanity pages. Best, GPL93 (talk) 11:42, 23 April 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.