Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vajrayudham


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  01:54, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Vajrayudham

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing was found in a WP:BEFORE except film database sites, videos, and promo material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmomusico (talk • contribs) 03:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.--Filmomusico (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment One of a large set of similar AfDs on Indian films by this nominator, none of which were transcluded to a daily log. Fixing now--I am neutral on the nominations themselves.  --Finngall talk  18:17, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 20:28, 20 August 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 22:40, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Finngall, i can see the nominator randomly nominates many film's pages. Though this article needs more references.Johnson Wagart (talk) 13:25, 28 August 2021 (UTC) Blocked sock; see Sockpuppet investigations/JeepersClub. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * My repair work on this series of nominations should be construed neither as a !vote either way nor as a questioning of the good faith of the nominator. --Finngall talk  16:07, 28 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.