Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valentina Taylor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy Delete as G12 by Dank. (NAC) Pastor Theo (talk) 00:19, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Valentina Taylor

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I've decided to AFD this instead of A7, as something of a test case. This lady is a newsreader for Naked News. As far as I can tell, that's her only claim to notability. So, the question is, is that enough to pass the notability threshold. I do not believe so. There are some other Naked News readers with articles and no other claims to notability. So depending on the outcome of this debate, those others may or may not also be AFDed soon after. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:24, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Add to the dubious claim for notability the prose of the article, which reads suspiciously like public relations text lifted from somewhere else. JNW (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. TexasAndroid (talk) 14:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Yes, it's a copyvio from her Myspace page. Google "Valentina has always had a taste for glamor".  Who knew what some people consider glamor.  Anyway, there are no news stories about her.  If anyone has significant in-depth coverage in reliable independent sources and the article is completely re-written to remove the copyright violation I will reconsider.  Not notable. Fails WP:BIO including WP:PORNBIO if it applies which I don't think it really does. Drawn Some (talk) 15:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't seem to have any notability as a newsreader, nothing in Google News; a bit in Google, but her exposure (joke) seems to come from taking her clothes off, which I guess makes WP:PORNBIO the relevant standard. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedied. Word-for-word copyvio. - Dank (push to talk) 00:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.