Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeri V. Cordón


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Mkdw  talk 23:24, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

Valeri V. Cordón

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A subject that does not meet WP:BASIC. This source listed in the article's references section provides some coverage, but multiple, independent reliable sources that provide significant coverage are required, not just one. The remaining three listed sources are primary, which do not establish notability. Several WP:BEFORE source searches, including custom searches, are only providing minor mentions and name checks in independent, reliable sources, which do not establish notability. North America1000 12:32, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep The insistence on multiple non-LDS published sources is unreasonable. Cordon is a widely followed figure, his talk in general conference generated a lot of coverage, and he has a significant role in the LDS Church.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:42, 14 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but publications that are literally owned and published by the LDS church, such as Liahona and Church News, are entirely primary sources , and are not usable to establish notability. The same goes for Lds.org content, which is the church's website. Religious subjects are not given a free pass for an article on Wikipedia; what's needed is independent coverage in multiple reliable sources that provide significant coverage. It's also important to keep WP:SPIP in mind, some of which is listed below.
 * "The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the topic itself (or of its manufacturer, creator, author, inventor, or vendor) have actually considered the topic notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works of their own that focus upon it—without incentive, promotion, or other influence by people connected to the topic matter."
 * – North America1000 02:10, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SkyGazer 512 Oh no, what did I do this time? 15:34, 21 October 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So said The Great Wiki Lord. (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.