Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valeria Purpura


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  10:12, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Valeria Purpura

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability as per WP:ACADEMIC. Spyder212 (talk) 04:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Lean keep: (Disclaimer, article creator) I definitely agree that it's right on the line. But she's been mentioned around 30-40 times in the popular press/scientific literature: which seems to narrowly meet the criteria of notability. I don't particularly care one way or another, though. And it can temporarily be moved to my private sandbox: if that's something that you prefer for now. I certainly don't think it's a vital article – probably only slightly meeting the criteria of being included – but I'll be updating it and adding more sources within the next week as well. It's all up to you. AttaAx (talk) 04:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete. The h-index of around 8, with top cited paprer having 32 cites in GScholar, far too low for WP:PROF, and nothing else to indicate notablity per WP:PROF or on any other grounds. Nsk92 (talk) 10:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. She appears not to pass WP:PROF and neither the references provided in the article nor what I can find from searching point to any other kind of notability. Mentions in popular press are not good enough; we need in-depth coverage of her or of her work. —David Eppstein (talk) 02:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looks WP:TOOSOON for WP:NPROF C1, no signs of GNG or of any other notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.