Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valied

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. ugen 64 04:04, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Valied
Pretty obvious vanity article. If they're just starting out they're hardly notable. Also includes a personal insult. &mdash; J I P | Talk 11:36, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable band. Article is unencyclopedic. jni 15:36, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, possible band vanity. Megan1967 04:39, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete - David Gerard 10:21, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.