Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valladares (2nd nomination)

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. There was no clear consensus after well over two weeks of discussion, even if I were inclined to cast aside 212.101.64.4's contribution to the discussion (which I'm not). --Tony Sidaway Talk 10:47, 10 September 2005 (UTC)

Valladares
Not notable and family-name-vanity. --fvw *  20:05, August 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * As seen above, Valladares was nominated for deletion on August 23, but since then, no further votes have been received. I am resubmitting this to the August 30 VFD list, and abstain from voting. I think this as a good time as any to remind people to use and not  when nominating articles for deletion, especially these days when there have been some conflicts over the wording of the vfd template. Sjakkalle  (Check!)  09:02, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Ooh, no votes at all, don't think I've ever seen that happen before. As for vs. , I've yet to be given any argument for it and it's more typing, so I'm just not convinced. If you really want to dredge the matter up again, have a look at my comments in the argument on talk back when the subst: was first added to the instructions. I'll grant you, it would have prevented some of the collateral damage caused by the namechange war, but that damage and a lot more would have been prevented if people had thought of way to migrate from one name to the other without lots of breakage before fucking with the template. Anyway, that's not a discussion for here, but if you feel like it please do come to my talk page, I'm sure I can find much more bile to spew.
 * Oh, and still delete, but I suppose you guessed that. --fvw *  11:24, August 30, 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep - What's wrong with including articles on the orgins of names and other things of interest? 212.101.64.4 09:03, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per fvw. Demogorgon's Soup-taster 13:25, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:ISNOT a genealogy database. Zoe 21:46, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nothing wrong with the article. Pengo 13:29, 8 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.