Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valle Alto (Monterrey)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Gwen Gale (talk) 16:34, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Valle Alto (Monterrey)
Of all the contents stated on this article 80% are not sourced and the rest 20% is not verifiable (the sources does not say anything about what was "sourced"). Also apparent original research is in the article with somebody's description of it but nowhere to be found where it was published. With violation of 2 of the main Wikipedia's core policies, I submit this article for deletion.--Aldoman (talk) 16:51, 14 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions.   —Aldoman (talk) 16:52, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep — The article is notable, and the information. It needs sources yes, but I don't see the original research. Leonard^Bloom (talk) 20:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Monterray. Suburb seems not notable enough in its own right. Doesn't look like OR to me, just needs better sourcing.Yobmod (talk) 12:25, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and do not merge--75,000 population is notable in its own right. DGG (talk) 06:10, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I seem to have misinterpreted the word "suburb"--it is not an incorporated area but a neighborhood & there seems to be no real indication that it's distinctive or politically of any autonomy. See the esWP article on Monterrey which describes it in part of a sentence as "el sector Valle Alto ". There would need to be more specific sourcing to justify the article. Without it, I'd be inclined to defer to esWP, which does not have an article.  DGG (talk) 09:22, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Question: is it incorporated?  If it has its own government then keep; else, merge it with whatever political subdivision it is technically a part of. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 05:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: It is one of the 744 unincorporated "neighbourhoods" of the municipality of Monterrey. The real population of the neighborhood is less than 16000 in a city of almost 1.7 million it is less than 1% of the population, making it completely irrelevant.--Aldoman (talk) 05:02, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - real neighborhoods of a significant size ought to be included in WP. Bearian (talk) 15:25, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - has some style issues, but an area with a population of 75,000 is notable --T-rex 16:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.