Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valle San Giovanni

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. Mackensen (talk) 01:15, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Valle San Giovanni
It is a small town. It has a church. So what? Radiant! 00:20, 13 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Orphaned VfD subpage, resubmitted under today's heading. jni 07:10, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Real place. keep.  RickK 07:15, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears to be a real town. Even small ones are notable enough for inclusion. jni 08:27, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real places are inherently notable, especially any place with a medieval church. / up+land 09:26, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Real place in Abruzzo, ItalyCapitalistroadster 11:28, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. utcursch 13:01, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Wikipedia is full of articles on tiny places in remote corners of the American Midwest with populations in single figures, "0.00% of whom are Pacific Islanders" etc. You know the ones I mean. Click random page a few times. It was long ago settled that Rambot articles belong here, so why would we want to delete manually created articles on towns in other countries. I thought it was universally recognised that every human settlement in the world was theoretically entitled to its own entry in Wikipedia, provided some kind of useful information is given. As long as this place exists we should have an article on it. Trilobite (Talk) 14:40, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Good argument. Request withdrawn. Radiant! 15:25, Feb 16, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep I like this kind of stuff, and the image just takes you there -- Longhair 14:47, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)