Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Twice relisted and the only vote is delete. It's time to move on. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Valley (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a band, with no strong claim of notability per WP:NMUSIC and very little reliable source coverage to support it. The strongest notability claim here is charting on Spotify, a BADCHART that cannot count toward passing the charting criterion at all -- and apart from a single feature on a local news program in their own hometown, this is otherwise referenced entirely to primary sources like Facebook pages, press release distribution platforms, concert listings directories and podcasts that cannot assist in supporting notability. As always, Wikipedia is not a free PR platform on which every band is automatically entitled to have an article just because they exist -- a proper claim of notability, and proper reliable sourcing to support it, must be present for an article to become earned, but nothing here satisfies either part of that equation. Bearcat (talk) 11:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:55, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- no claim to notability and largely cited to non-independent and / or primary sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:14, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Linguist talk&#124; contribs  07:42, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.