Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valley Center History Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Valley Center, California. Per Merging, a redirect is typically performed after a merge has been performed. North America1000 15:27, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Valley Center History Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Hyperlocal coverage in the few RS that exist. Fails WP:ORG ( I looked for more sources, they are more of the same as what is here) Also ceated by SOCKing editor connected to Roadrunner Publications, Inc., which in turn is controlled by Justin Salter, Director Website/Social Media/Newsletters of this organization per this - clearly created for promotion. Jytdog (talk) 09:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge this small museum to Valley Center, California as per standards re: small museums Museum projects : " If it's a small historical museum in a small town, it probably does not deserve an article of its own, but it almost certainly merits a mention in the article about the town.... (where)  probably a paragraph about almost any museum would be welcome."E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  15:25, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge per EMG. BMK (talk) 18:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge excerpt should be included in Valley Center, California, but it does not need it's own stand alone article Vchero (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Redirect and merge per E.M.Gregory. Compare for example, South Sea Islands Museum in Cooranbong, Australia which was kept because it had received national coverage as well as recognition of the importance of its exhibits by the Australian Department of the Environment and Heritage. This is not the case with this museum. Voceditenore (talk) 08:24, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * I am fine with redirect and merge. I would close this myself and do that but that is too bold, I fear. Jytdog (talk) 08:39, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.