Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valorie Burton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:51, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Valorie Burton

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is only sourced to Burton's own websites. To make things worse, it seems to have had this horrible lack of good sourcing for 6 years. John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:39, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

*Delete as a BLP without sources and per WP:PROMO; strictly advertorial content. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:52, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete unless RSes show up She looks like someone who should be notable, she is in fact slightly famous ... but what we have here is a WP:BLP without WP:RSes, and we're not allowed to do that - David Gerard (talk) 08:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Refs added for this "slightly famous" person that lazy editors didn't have time to add some easy-peasy references. Are you serious? Hmlarson (talk) 01:19, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Her work has enough critical attention under NAUTHOR. I added references under publications. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per article improvements. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:54, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdraw There appears to be enough sources to justify the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:46, 8 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.