Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valsartdiary


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 04:51, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Valsartdiary

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

websites with a PR of 3 are not popular Misterdiscreet 19:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - A press release is not enough to sustain notability. No results found on a google news archive search Corpx 19:59, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Google pagerank should only be used to determine a ranking in the Google system and not as an overall popularity indicator. Second, this isn't a popularity contest, at least cite policy before putting something up for deletion. Joe User NY 20:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable Youtube production. Having a lot of viewers is not a substitute for receiving independent news coverage. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 23:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Zetawoof. Bearian 00:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep "millions of viewers" says it all, even if it is just on YouTube. Froese 20:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No news coverage. There are internet phenomena who became notable. If it does, in time, the article should then be reconsidered for creation. As of now, not notable enough. hmwith  talk  23:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.