Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valuation of nonmarket housework


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Unpaid work. Daniel (talk) 22:25, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Valuation of nonmarket housework

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:ESSAY on a subject that's better covered at unpaid work. Orphaned for a decade. Pepper Beast   (talk)  16:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep -- There is secondary sourcing specific to the subject beyond the Unpaid work article. I feel that the sourcing already in the article is sufficient to pass GNG, and there is a lot more out there if anyone comes along who is motivated to improve the article. The article as it stands needs cleanup, but it not misleading or inaccurate. Deleting it does not improve the encyclopaedia and is not required by policy. Cheers, Last1in (talk) 18:43, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to unpaid work- this article does have some good content in it that is sourced, and with a bit of cleanup would fit nicely in unpaid work. GraziePrego (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to unpaid work. The merge target is currently 4443 words i.e. likely within WP:SIZERULE post-merge, and the sourced statements are worth salvaging. Darcyisvery cute (talk) 13:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per the above. Given the substantial overlap in the two topics it makes sense to cover them in a single article and this one has the less obvious name and contents though there is some sourced content worth preserving.  Eluchil404 (talk) 09:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.