Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ValueFirst Messaging

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was copyvio. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 03:21, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)

ValueFirst Messaging
Wrongly proposed for speedy delete as advertising so tag changed to Votes for deletion. --Henrygb 00:27, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's advertising. delete --Asriel86 00:44, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this wonderful advertisement of this brilliant company's genius line of products. -- 8^D gab 00:54, 2005 Apr 9 (UTC)
 * Delete not only an ad, has severe notability problems too. Just over 90 unique Google hits link is pretty pathetic for a tech company, and their current Alexa score of 920,063 isn't making them look any better either. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  12:39, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * PS: also, zero hits on either Google Groups or Google News. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 12:40, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)
 * Bzzzt. copyvio from . But thank you for playing. (I've added it to Copyright problems.) FreplySpang (talk) 13:23, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * It was posted by an employee of the company User:Shantanu --Henrygb 20:51, 9 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.