Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Value of the United States


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 13:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Value of the United States

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Orphaned, uncited POV article, likely original research. Author has not edited since posting in late December. Subject is covered in other articles already. SmartGuy 14:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete POV and OR. --Tainter 15:03, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete OR essay.-- danntm T C 15:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete OR article Optimale  Gu 16:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. as above. Mystache 16:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. If someone signs their name on the article page, It's usually OR. --UsaSatsui 18:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete essay GabrielF 19:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete kinda interesting though. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  23:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete From the beginning to the end, it could use a rewrite. Not a citation and plenty of subjectivity with a structure that reads like a proposal for a research project. At many points in the article, the author states things like, "I expect that it would be far greater with a more complete list." Statements like that alone are declare the article to be inherently incomplete and biased. It would be much different if this was an article that reviewed the economic value of the U.S. with citations and references rather than speculation. --SquatGoblin 17:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree that it could be rewritten and possibly prove useful, but the original author has not made an edit since posting this article. SmartGuy 14:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as solely, and relatively admittedly (signature) POV. SkierRMH 03:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, not encyclopediatic. --Soman 10:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.