Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire: The Dark Ages Storytellers Screen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deleting per the rationale presented by the nominator and. I used to actually play Vampire back in the day. I loved the Dark Ages... Missvain (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Vampire: The Dark Ages Storytellers Screen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

So, this is a screen you could by for a game, which had no other value than hiding the "storyteller" in a slightly more decorative manner, but played no further role, made no difference, had no impact, won no awards, ... It got a "review" in an apparently extremely completist niche magazine, the kind that reviews everything in its niche, and has sunk to oblivion since. Comparable to last years Articles for deletion/Unitrays by the same editor it seems. Fram (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - That single source is not nearly enough for this product to pass the WP:GNG. I'm not finding anything else of any substance regarding the product, so unless further reliable sources can be found, I can't see this being considered to be notable at all.  Rorshacma (talk) 17:23, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep if more sources can be found, otherwise merge the review to Vampire: The Dark Ages. BOZ (talk) 15:09, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Per WP:UNDUE, this has no place in the general Vampire: The Dark Ages, as it is a piece of pure trivia. And if you, as article creator and with knowledge of the topic, don't know of further sources, then the chances that anything but the obscure would exist seems minimal. Fram (talk) 08:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hugsyrup 16:50, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per BOZ. Freeknowledgecreator (talk) 01:46, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
 * That's a "delete" then? Since, well, no more sources have been found, so the "if" part of their keep is not fulfilled... Fram (talk) 05:33, 22 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.