Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampire Kisses (novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Vampire Kisses (series).  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 23:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Vampire Kisses (novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Delete this as non-notable and redirect to Vampire Kisses (series) as pursuant to discussion at Articles_for_deletion/Ellen_Schreiber_(2nd_nomination) (the author of the series, where it has been established that the author and individual books are not notable, but the series as a whole is borderline-notable). St John Chrysostom ΔόξατωΘεώ 17:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Merge anything appropriate to Vampire Kisses (series), without deletion. There is no policy-based reason to delete the material here, so per WP:ATD, it should be left visible in the redirect history just in case someone wants to come along later and try to expand it to establish notability for this book. Jclemens (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Look at the page - there's nothing to merge, as both pages are currently overflowing with WP:DICTIONARY-style plot summaries and character biographies (which occupy 90%+ of the text of each page). St John Chrysostom ΔόξατωΘεώ 23:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete and redirect per above. Everything that could be merged has been merged, all that's left is a plot summary that wouldn't entirely fit on the page for the series as a whole.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Please note that this entire corner of Wikipedia - the interlinked "UF"(?) non-notable authors and their books, and articles listing nothing but hundreds of SP books, etc. is extremely WP:FANCRUFTy, lacking, in general, WP:NPOV, WP:NOTABILITY, lack of WP:OR, and all of the other things that come along with fan-cruft. St John Chrysostom ΔόξατωΘεώ 01:05, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.