Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vampirism Revolution (2 nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   02:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Vampirism Revolution
I spotted this map up for a very poorly done mass AFD and also noted that it has been voted on before with an outcome of no consensus. We see arguments in the previous AFD such as "notable warcraft map", I'm sure it was made in good faith, I do however, call bullshits. Another mass AFD at Articles for deletion/De dust resulted in no consensus, yet each of those maps has unique google links in the hundreds or thousands. This doesn't, at all with a paltry 18 Google links for "Vampirism Revolution". This is not a notable or popular warcraft map, at all. - Hahnch e  n 00:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nice work. Yanksox 00:49, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see evidence of notability. --Ed (Edgar181) 01:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, there are untold numbers of warcraft maps Markeer 01:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, nn. --Ter e nce Ong 02:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, nn, etc. Adambiswanger1 03:02, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to um...something I dunno, Warcraft III World Editor maybe? I'm not sure which page is best.--SeizureDog 03:10, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable Warcraft map. J I P  | Talk 08:36, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, NN. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, not notable. --Coredesat 09:19, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, per nom... and from the article intro: "released by a Battle.net user known as Alpha_Hacka, is a custom map". Cruft. Bye. - Motor (talk) 10:18, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Things like this are the definition of fancruft Ydam 11:04, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, can a custom map ever be notable? Paul Carpenter 11:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I would say yes, if the map became so pervasive that it was as/more popular that the original game. The criteria for custom maps/mods to be included should be extremely high due to the sheer number of customizations that exist for various games across the board.--Isotope23 12:57, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the comments by Isotope23 but this custom map is not a highly notable one. Appears fairly unnotable. -- Evanx  (tag?) 17:39, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Inner Earth 17:44, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I am myself a warcraft III player and I have never even noticed this map. --Ludvig 20:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the nomination. --HolyRomanEmperor 20:31, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Doesn't hurt anything. --Ephilei 02:57, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
 * If "doesn't hurt anything" was reason enough for keep, Wikipedia would be chock-full with articles about random bits of paper people found in their pockets. J I P  | Talk 18:33, 8 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.