Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Van Hise Elementary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Madison Metropolitan School District. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Van Hise Elementary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A non-notable elementary school. A BEFORE found no significant coverage and only passing mentions. Fails GNG. Colin Bear ( talk  - contributions) 05:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  Colin Bear  ( talk  - contributions) 05:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  Colin Bear  ( talk  - contributions) 05:47, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2021 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Madison Metropolitan School District per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. It's notable in that I occasionally had softball practice in the playground area ;) In all seriousness, it's a non-notable primary school that fails a before check. All coverage is local and routine.  Kncny11  (shoot) 17:50, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Madison Metropolitan School District, per WP:ATD. This should be the standard for NN public schools in the US. It serves as a valid and sufficiently unique search term. This could have been done BOLDly. 209.63.121.20 (talk) 22:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete or Redirect I'm fine with either. As things currently stand though there isn't the non-trivial, in-depth sources required to justify keeping the article. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete the long view has been that for elementary schools we need a very clear showing of notability to justify keeping the article. We have no such showing here.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect, per above.-- Surv1v4l1st ▌Talk 19:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.