Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanaraja


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. (non-admin closure) – Davey 2010 Talk 03:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Vanaraja

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced, no references. Possible merge with Chicken? smileguy91talk 03:52, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added some references. If it may help to undelete it.--Vin09 (talk) 10:58, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 24 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable poultry variety with plenty of coverage in the press, academia and elsewhere. Article much improved and Wikified since nomination. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arb (talk • contribs) 15:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Obviously fully notable, reported to DAD-IS by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research, extensively discussed in scientific literature. Ideally, the nominator would have performed that search WP:BEFORE starting this discussion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. Plenty of academic coverage. I will not DAD-IS is not a very reliable source, but all the rest proves to me that this is notable. Even more can be easily found by a google. Please use WP:BEFORE in future.  JT dale Talk ~ 04:57, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – The article has been improved so far and looks like it is notable enough to stay here. — Joaquin008  ( talk ) 12:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.