Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  20:06, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES entry referenced to press releases, local news and similar low quality sources. Not seeing what makes this company pass WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. Looks like WP:CORPSPAM. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  16:21, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * As the author and sole editor of the article I have a rather clear COI and therefore won't formally vote either way here. However since this AfD I've tripled the article length with some more information to attempt to establish notability and a lot more references, although I'm aware it's still very much borderline, and there are absolutely a lot of weak and likely unnecessary references mixed in, I sometimes forget more is not always better. I do invite the original nominator to read it again to see if the additions help with any of the noted concerns. Understandable if not, as I said it's very borderline but I personally felt when creating the article it was enough to pass WP:NCOMPANY. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 05:38, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Is there any source that discusses the company in-depth that's not promotional? All I see are still mentions in passing, press releases and their rewrites, plus niche awards / rankings. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * hi, not sure as i have only added this afd to a list, you may have meant to direct your question to ? Coolabahapple (talk) 10:25, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Right you are, . --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:15, 6 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 22:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Reviewers: The article has been expanded and new sourcing added. Please review in your consideration.
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing</b>++ 20:53, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:BARE. Technically, this passes due to WP:SIGCOV - ongoing and significant coverage in reliable sources. I have not !voted an outright keep because, from a neutral perspective, they do not seem to have done anything particularly notable. Bearian (talk) 22:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep substantially expanded versus the version at time of nomination for deletion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:00, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 16:26, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment The only "update" since the !votes above has been to update the number of employees. No new references have been added. I stick with my original comment to Delete and I will add that notability is not inherited, so while they may have been involved in high profile projects, not a single significant reference is written *about* this organization. <b style="font-family: Courier; color: darkgreen;"> HighKing</b>++ 12:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.