Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vancouver Foreign Ministers’ Meeting on Security and Stability on Korean Peninsula


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not much discussion, but what there was is clearly in support of keeping.

And, yeah, poor article title  is right. Somebody please find a better title and move it there. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Vancouver Foreign Ministers’ Meeting on Security and Stability on Korean Peninsula

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Last update was before occurrence of the meeting, little documentation of occurrences, poor article title. Citing WP:N. -- Jeremy Ahn (talk 11:31, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment: What part of WP:N are you citing? Article content does not determine notability. If there is enough coverage about the meeting, including of its outcome, in reliable sources out there that are not (yet) cited in the article, the article topic is still notable. (Is there?) – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 11:34, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll answer my own query: yes there is, lots, some of which I've added to the article. Keep. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:56, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:57, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:56, 29 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:50, 5 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep: This was a fairly significant development, also unsure what part of WP:N the original poster was citing. Murchison-Eye (talk) 22:14, 5 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.