Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandana Shiva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep by unambiguous and unanimous community decision. Psy guy (talk) 06:26, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

Vandana Shiva
Article is unencyclopaediac and reads like an essay 61.1.145.236
 * Keep, sounds like a possible case for cleanup, not deletion. Kappa 09:32, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The article has been up since 2002 and it just now qualify for an AfD. Also this users only edits have been to today's AfD page, this AfD, the Vandana Shiva article and this error CambridgeBayWeather 09:37, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep 444,000 Googles. Very poor Afd nomination.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk   09:50, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep .She is such a famous personality,Wiki will be very incomplete without her.--Sahodaran 11:42, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep It just needs a clean-up. PJM 14:21, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep The article looks encyclopediac enough to my eyes. Does not seem to be much in need of even clean-up. Needs perhaps more content. Surprised to see it put up as Afd; perhaps needs to be expanded rather. However I don't know very much about her and am too lazy to research something to expand the article. I remember the first time i read something by her; it was the text of a first-class antiglob. speech she made somewhere--South Africa, the international women's court--really not sure if that's correct; reproduced in the Hindu sunday magazine something like.. mm.. 5 or 6 years ago. i think --Pournami
 * Strong keep bad faith nomination --Reflex Reaction 17:45, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep as per WP:BIO. Notable activist recognised by UN awards. Could an administrator please look at Speedy Keeping this as the concensus of the community on this article is pretty clear. Capitalistroadster 18:19, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable racist. Gazpacho 21:33, 28 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep Tintin 00:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Obviously. utcursch | talk 04:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong keep and clean up. Jacqui  ★ 05:55, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep- --Bhadani 12:09, 30 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.