Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandaveer


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz Humbug! 11:24, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Vandaveer

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significant coverage cited, just directory listings and a blog review. Of news sources, I found a non-local one (DC area and Louisville/Lexingon would be more local and I found those too). Not really what I'd consider enough to meet WP:BAND. Happy to withdraw this nomination if judged notable. ~Amatulić (talk) 00:09, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete as simply none of the current coverage even suggests minimal general notability for the applicable guidelines. SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Please note substantial coverage found in a cursory Google search: Allmusic, Paste Magazine, Consequence of Sound, Line of Best Fit, PopMatters, PopMatters again, Washington Post. See also NPR performance. Chubbles (talk) 17:32, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NMUSIC per non-trivial coverage in reliable sources, as Chubbles demonstrates above. — sparklism hey! 20:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.