Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandkulturhuset (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to DGI-byen. (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang  The clock is ticking....  21:42, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Vandkulturhuset
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

I slapped a multiple issues tag on this earlier today, but on further reflection I've decided to bring it here. The article survived an AfD back in 2008 with just two "keep" !votes—one by the article's creator—but the rationale of the nominator then remains valid: the article is certainly spammy (and contains no sources whatever). The place does get mentioned in travel guides, usually in the context of the hotel of which it is part, but I can't find the sort of substantive, third-party sources that would satisfy WP:N. Even the Danish Wikipedia lacks an article on it. Deor (talk) 22:29, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect to DGI-byen, the facility of which it is a part. It does not appear to be notable on its own. (The notability of DGI-byen itself may be questionable, but I'll leave that for others to evaluate.) --MelanieN (talk) 21:52, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect as above as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the page. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. The page is a puff piece, and I can find no reliable sources that provide any kind of in-depth coverage of the place. Drmies (talk) 21:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.